-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[#493] Integrate Danger to the generated project #579
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[#493] Integrate Danger to the generated project #579
Conversation
Kover report for template-compose:🧛 Template - Compose Unit Tests Code Coverage:
|
File | Coverage |
---|
Modified Files Not Found In Coverage Report:
Dangerfile
Gemfile
Gemfile
Gemfile.lock
review_pull_request.yml
template_review_pull_request.yml
Codebase cunningly covered by count Shroud 🧛
Generated by 🚫 Danger
8c6984f
to
db8238c
Compare
db8238c
to
003bb3b
Compare
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request include modifications to existing GitHub workflows and the introduction of new files for automating the pull request review process. The primary updates involve enhancements to the Ruby setup and caching mechanisms in the workflow for reviewing pull requests, alongside the addition of a new workflow file. The Dangerfile has been updated to include new warning checks for PRs, and a new Gemfile has been created to manage Ruby dependencies related to the Danger tool. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant GitHub
participant Danger
participant Ruby
participant Gradle
User->>GitHub: Open Pull Request
GitHub->>Danger: Trigger Review Process
Danger->>Ruby: Set Up Ruby Environment
Ruby->>Gradle: Cache Dependencies
Gradle->>Danger: Run Checks
Danger->>User: Provide Review Feedback
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
template-compose/Dangerfile (1)
4-5
: Consider adjusting the line threshold for "Big PR" warningThe current threshold of 500 lines might be too high for effective code review. Consider lowering it to 300-400 lines to encourage smaller, more focused PRs.
-warn("Big PR") if git.lines_of_code > 500 +warn("Big PR, please consider breaking it down into smaller ones") if git.lines_of_code > 300
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
template-compose/Gemfile.lock
is excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.github/workflows/review_pull_request.yml
(1 hunks)template-compose/.github/workflows/template_review_pull_request.yml
(1 hunks)template-compose/Dangerfile
(1 hunks)template-compose/Gemfile
(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- template-compose/Gemfile
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
template-compose/.github/workflows/template_review_pull_request.yml
[error] 41-41: syntax error: expected , but found ''
(syntax)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
template-compose/Dangerfile (1)
17-22
: Verify Detekt report path and consider adding failure threshold
The current configuration only warns but doesn't fail on serious issues. Consider adding severity thresholds.
template-compose/.github/workflows/template_review_pull_request.yml (1)
47-63
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove redundant gem caching and version checks
Similar to the main workflow, the gem caching is redundant. Additionally, the version checks are unnecessary when using setup-ruby
action.
Remove both the cache and version check steps:
- - name: Cache gems
- uses: actions/cache@v2
- with:
- path: vendor/bundle
- key: ${{ runner.os }}-gems-${{ hashFiles('**/Gemfile.lock') }}
- restore-keys: |
- ${{ runner.os }}-gems-
-
- - name: Install Bundle and check environment versions
- run: |
- echo 'Install Bundle'
- bundle config path vendor/bundle
- bundle install
- echo 'Check environment setup versions'
- ruby --version
- gem --version
- bundler --version
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
template-compose/.github/workflows/template_review_pull_request.yml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Tiger <[email protected]>
4d15ea8
to
54f5f56
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
Gemfile (1)
4-4
: Maintain consistent quote style in gem declarations.Use single quotes to maintain consistency with other gem declarations in the file.
-gem "danger-checkstyle_format" +gem 'danger-checkstyle_format'
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
template-compose/Gemfile.lock
is excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.github/workflows/review_pull_request.yml
(1 hunks)Gemfile
(1 hunks)template-compose/.github/workflows/template_review_pull_request.yml
(1 hunks)template-compose/Dangerfile
(1 hunks)template-compose/Gemfile
(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- template-compose/Gemfile
- .github/workflows/review_pull_request.yml
- template-compose/Dangerfile
- template-compose/.github/workflows/template_review_pull_request.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Review pull request
- GitHub Check: Verify newproject script
- GitHub Check: Run Detekt and unit tests
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Gemfile (1)
Line range hint
1-6
: Verify the impact of removed gems.The PR objectives mention integrating Detekt, but
danger-kotlin_detekt
gem has been removed. Additionally,danger-commit_lint
for commit message validation anddanger-shroud
for security scanning were removed.Let's verify if these features are handled differently:
🧰 Tools
🪛 rubocop (1.69.1)
[convention] 5-5: Gems should be sorted in an alphabetical order within their section of the Gemfile. Gem
danger-android_lint
should appear beforedanger-checkstyle_format
.(Bundler/OrderedGems)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
.github/workflows/review_pull_request.yml (1)
27-32
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionRemove redundant gem caching configuration
The
bundler-cache: true
in the Ruby setup step already handles gem caching. The separate gem caching step is redundant.- - uses: actions/cache@v4 - with: - path: vendor/bundle - key: ${{ runner.os }}-gems-${{ hashFiles('Gemfile') }} - restore-keys: | - ${{ runner.os }}-gems-
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/review_pull_request.yml (1)
Line range hint
57-57
: Update cache action version for consistencyThe workflow uses actions/cache@v4 for gem caching but v2 for Gradle caching. For consistency and to leverage the latest features, update to v4.
- uses: actions/cache@v2 + uses: actions/cache@v4
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/review_pull_request.yml
(1 hunks)template-compose/.github/workflows/template_review_pull_request.yml
(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- template-compose/.github/workflows/template_review_pull_request.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Review pull request
- GitHub Check: Verify newproject script
- GitHub Check: Run Detekt and unit tests
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/review_pull_request.yml (1)
33-40
: Well-configured Danger setup!The Danger action is properly configured with all necessary parameters and follows security best practices by using GitHub token for authentication.
ecee45a
to
ddd1fb5
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/review_pull_request.yml (1)
Line range hint
28-28
: Update cache action to latest versionThe workflow uses
actions/cache@v2
which is outdated. Consider updating toactions/cache@v4
for the latest features and security updates.- - name: Cache Gradle - uses: actions/cache@v2 + - name: Cache Gradle + uses: actions/cache@v4
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/review_pull_request.yml
(2 hunks)template-compose/.github/workflows/template_review_pull_request.yml
(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- template-compose/.github/workflows/template_review_pull_request.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/review_pull_request.yml
65-65: input "run" is not defined in action "ruby/setup-ruby@v1". available inputs are "bundler", "bundler-cache", "cache-version", "ruby-version", "rubygems", "self-hosted", "windows-toolchain", "working-directory"
(action)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Run Detekt and unit tests
- GitHub Check: Review pull request
- GitHub Check: Verify newproject script
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/review_pull_request.yml (2)
66-71
: Remove redundant gem caching configurationThe
bundler-cache: true
in the Ruby setup step already handles gem caching. The separate gem caching step is redundant.- - uses: actions/cache@v4 - with: - path: vendor/bundle - key: ${{ runner.os }}-gems-${{ hashFiles('Gemfile') }} - restore-keys: | - ${{ runner.os }}-gems-
72-79
: LGTM! Well-configured Danger integrationThe Danger action is properly configured with all necessary parameters:
- Correct plugin file path
- Appropriate installation directory
- Danger file specification
- Unique danger ID
- Proper GitHub token usage
bda55a8
to
b6a4d6b
Compare
#493
What happened 👀
CI/CD pipeline specifically for reviewing pull requests within our Android project template. A total of 76 additions have been made to the
.github/workflows/repiew_pull_request.yml
file, enhancing its capabilities and adding new steps for better code quality checks and environment management.Insight 📝
Proof Of Work 📹
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Gemfile
to manage Ruby gems for enhanced code review processes.Enhancements
Bug Fixes
Chores